Parts of the health system appear to have become more efficient, as medical providers have been more cautious about adopting new therapies without much evidence, and more care has shifted outside hospitals into cheaper settings. (Medicare is currently barred by statute from covering the new class of expensive anti-obesity drugs.) And drug makers and surgeons haven’t developed as many new blockbuster treatments recently - there has been no new Prozac or angioplasty to drive up spending. Older Americans appear to be having fewer heart attacks and strokes, the likely result of effective cholesterol and blood pressure medicines that became cheap and widely used in recent years, according to research from Professor Cutler and colleagues. Most of those reductions came from a category the budget office calls “technical adjustments,” which it uses to describe changes to public health and the practice of medicine itself. In a recent letter to the Senate Budget Committee, economists at the Congressional Budget Office described the huge reductions in its Medicare forecasts between 20. Congress also cut Medicare payments as part of a budget deal in 2011.īut most of the savings can’t be attributed to any obvious policy shift. The biggest such shift came with the Affordable Care Act in 2010, which reduced Medicare’s payments to hospitals and to health insurers that offered private Medicare Advantage plans. Some of the reductions are easy to explain. Scholars have been arguing about it for years, but no one seems sure enough to confidently predict whether it is likely to stick around for much longer. The reason for the per-person slowdown is a bit of a mystery. “Without a doubt, this is the most important thing that has happened to the federal budget in the last 20 years,” said David Cutler, a professor of health policy and medicine at Harvard, who helped the Obama White House develop the Affordable Care Act. Budget news often sounds apocalyptic, but the Medicare trend has been unexpectedly good for federal spending, saving taxpayers a huge amount relative to projections. But it has had enormous consequences for federal spending. The trend can be a little hard to see because, as baby boomers have aged, the number of people using Medicare has grown. Instead of growing and growing, as it always had before, spending per Medicare beneficiary has nearly leveled off over more than a decade. Something strange has been happening in this giant federal program. Now, flat Medicare spending might be a bigger one. For decades, runaway Medicare spending was the story of the federal budget.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |